Book: MARRIAGE, GENDER AND ISLAM IN INDONESIA: WOMEN NEGOTIATING INFORMAL MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, AND DESIRE
MARIA PLATT
MARRIAGE,
GENDER AND ISLAM IN INDONESIA: WOMEN NEGOTIATING INFORMAL MARRIAGE, DIVORCE,
AND DESIRE, NEW YORK: ROUTLEDGE
SETTINGL
LOMBOK, WEST NUSA TENGGARA
Marriage in
Indonesia is moral and social in nature, and that marriage in Lombok ‘largely
remains community-based affairs (pp 5), and is truly a communal institution
Marriage
continuum:
· conceptualization of marital
practices as they occur across the span of women lives (p.5);
· marriage as a fluid, open-ended
endeavor which can be circuitous, rather than a fixed state (p 6)
· reconceptualise both the
fast-changing and iterative nature of individuals’ marital trajectories.
Given the
local western Lombok, unions tend to be fluid in nature with people moving in
and out of marriage, sometimes several times over throughout the course of
their lives. This etnography moves beyond simplistic accounts of marriage that
prevail in the social imagination, which typically criticize the fluidity of
Sasak marriage practices without seeking to understand them in any depth. Pp 5
This book
provides an in-depth understanding of what the dynamic nature of marriage
actually means for women according to their own perspectives. Pp 5
Concept of
Jodoh
Examination
of extramarital liaisons shows that it is not only men who are in a position to
pursue these relationships. Indeed, by exploring women’s subjectivities through
the lens of the marital continuum we can move beyond simple renderings of male
marital authority and female subservience to a more complicated reading of
women’s power across various stages of the marital continuum.
O’shaughnessy (2009) point out, Indonesian
ideas about social and economic development inherent in the Marriage Law were
deeply intertwined with the shaping of female legal subjectivities. For
example, as O’ Shaughnessy (2009, l 32) points out, the Marriage Law relies
upon gendered terminology, distinguishing between as ‘head of households’ and
women as ‘managers of households’. She goes onto note that this designation of
gender roles reflects ‘gendered legal subjectivities….directed at reshaping the
broader social order’. In this case, the Marriage Law sought to reflect
Indonesian ideals of modernity, which saw ‘the nuclear family as the basis of
[the] nation (Tiwon, 2000, p 73) while simultaneously upholding women as less
important than men within the context of household.
O’ Shaughnessy, K. 2009, Gender,
state and social power in contemporary Indonesia: Divorce and marriage law,
Routledge, London.
Tiwon, S. 2000. ‘Reconstructing
boundaries and beyond’, in J.Koning, M.Nolten, J.Rodenburg and R. Saptari (ed),
Women and Households in Indonesia: Cultural notions and social practices,
Curzon Press, Richmond, pp 68-84
Marriage
usually revolve around a person’s distinct marital status, such as single,
married, separated or divorced. Such accounts rarely take into consideration
the spaces that exist in between these various stages in a person’s often
complex marital trajectory
Within
marital continuum, women’s agency can transform throughout the course of their
lives, women ability to shape their marital destiny is not confined to this
first stage of the marital continuum (pp 77)
Marital
continuum is not static and consequently women’s agency across the spectrum
cannot be rendered in one specific form as a passive wife (pp 111)
c
Marriage
law as a project of modernity; Platt argues that it has failed, for instance
the practice of extramarital relationships, polygamy only based on Islamic
rules, not Indonesian Marriage law.
The
divergence between the state-based Marriage Law and community-based marriage
laws, which creates ambiguity in women’s legal rights, and concludes that
community-based law undermines the smooth implementation of the Marriage Law as
a project of modernity *p 141)
The very
design of the marriage registration process, I argue, is built upon normative
ideas of individual autonomy and free will, thus dispensing with, or at [least]
minimizing rituals that promote a more dynamic form of marriage (p 46); state
marriage processes simply lack relevance in the lives of many Sasak (pp 149)
Comments
Post a Comment